Search
Saturday, November 9th, 2024

Breaking News for

Sportsmen Since 1968

Search
Saturday, November 9th, 2024

Breaking News for

Sportsmen Since 1968

Outdoor Insights: Here’s why renewing Minnesota’s Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund matters this November

If it passes in this year's Minnesota election, Amendment 1 would extend dedication of 40% of state lottery proceeds to the Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund for 25 years. (Stock photo)

In addition to the people and parties seeking your support on Nov. 5, there’s a constitutional amendment that this outdoors scribe considers nonpartisan. If it passes, Amendment 1 would extend dedication of 40% of state lottery proceeds to the Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund for 25 years. Here’s exactly how it will read on your ballot:

“Shall the Minnesota Constitution be amended to protect drinking water sources and the water quality of lakes, rivers, and streams; conserve wildlife habitat and natural areas; improve air quality; and expand access to parks and trails by extending the transfer of proceeds from the state-operated lottery to the environment and natural resources trust fund, and to dedicate the proceeds for these purposes?”

It took years of haggling in the Legislature just to get that question on the ballot. Since then, the overwhelming chatter about the constitutional question has been strongly supportive, although I’ve heard some grumbling about the dollars not being available for wastewater treatment efforts for state municipalities, particularly in western Minnesota.

That’s never been the intention of these funds (that’s what local taxes are for), and if we start tapping ENRTF or the dedicated sales tax funding for municipal water infrastructure, it’ll absorb every penny of those dollars.

Minnesotans established the ENRTF in 1988 when 77% of voters supported the constitutional amendment creating the fund. We renewed it in 1998 (with 74% of the vote), and that reauthorization expires next year.

Citizens supported gambling 36 years ago because they wanted dollars for environmental causes. Passing it again three and a half decades later honors those outdoors advocates and citizens who had the foresight to establish a fund that has spent more than $1 billion on 1,600 projects since.

MORE COVERAGE FROM MINNESOTA OUTDOOR NEWS:

Heavy rain has impact on 2024 fawn survival in south-central Minnesota study area

Will Minnesota’s early teal season continue in 2025? Survey finds hunters still split

Minnesota elk hunters take eight for 10 during hunt

During that time, ENRTF dollars have financed research for probably every species of managed wildlife in the state – from prairie chickens to white-tailed deer. It’s also helped fund aquatic invasive species research, chronic wasting disease studies and monitoring, tree planting, some acquisition (especially prior to the Legacy amendment), protecting pollinators – all to the tune of $80 million this year. That annual number could increase to $100 million as soon as next year. Again, those are dollars that citizens willingly fork over when they buy lottery tickets, not your state income or sales taxes.

The ENRTF is different from the Legacy amendment of 2008, which dedicates a sliver of state sales taxes to outdoor projects and accomplishes more direct habitat and acquisition work. That’ll be the next big ballot initiative battle as those dollars dry up in 2034.

But for this fall, let’s worry about re-dedicating lottery proceeds. The new lottery dedication prevents the use of ENRTF funds for wastewater infrastructure, increases the annual withdrawal from the ENRTF from 5.5% to 7% (thanks to the growing principal), and appropriates the additional 1.5% of the ENRTF to a new Community Grant Program.

Minnesotans for Our Great Outdoors is advocating for amendment passage. The coalition includes sporting groups like the Minnesota Deer Hunters Association, Ducks Unlimited, and Pheasants Forever, among others.

Early voting is underway. Reminder than not voting counts as a “no” vote, so please do not ignore this ballot question.

I’ve been considering how old I’ll be when it comes time to re-dedicate these dollars 25 years from now and – from my perspective – that number isn’t pretty. But that’s a good thing for all the excellent work young Minnesotans can expect to see these dollars accomplish in their lifetimes.

With any luck, octogenarian Drieslein will be advocating for another 25-year extension in 2050.

8 thoughts on “Outdoor Insights: Here’s why renewing Minnesota’s Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund matters this November”

  1. Everyone supports clean water, more wildlife habitat and parks. On the ballot we only get to see, and vote for, the good stuff any outdoor enthusiast would support. Unfortunately that’s not exactly what this amendment actually does in it’s entirety.

    What should be a nonpartisan issue was made partisan by the enacting language the DFL controlled legislature chose. The legislature would no longer have oversight of major projects being funded, and a new community grant board is created for “equity “projects.

    Center of the American Experiment is a think tank which has been around more than 30 years and recent articles published by them regarding this amendment are worth reading.

    l

    1. I trust Outdoor News, Pheasants Forever, Ducks Unlimited, and Minnesota Deer Hunters Association a lot more than Center of the American Experiment. They’re a right-wing think tank funded by people outside Minnesota that don’t care about hunting or fishing. Don’t be fooled by these people.

  2. Thank you MNPHEASANTS and Outdoor News! Renewal of the Trust Fund is very important for a wide range of beneficial environmental and outdoors projects. The Republican Party is also on record opposing passage just because they don’t like a few provisions despite its many agreed upon features. On my ballot, it was on the backside (along with the judge elections) so it might be easy for many to miss, so please do vote “Yes”. Thank you!

  3. As someone who is generally on board with this type of funding mechanism, I simply cannot stomach the overt racism which will be used in selecting board members, and the mandated involvement of tribal representatives, which is a clear DFL sop to one of their largest financial political benefactors i.e. Minnesota tribes.

    The new committee tasked with reviewing and recommending policies and approvals of spending of the natural resources trust fund will be comprised of 11 members. Two must be citizens of the Ojibwe nation, two members must be from the Dakota nation, and four are chosen specifically on race – all must be non-white. That’s 73% of the board, which approves the spending, based solely on nationality or race.

    from the bill https://revisor.mn.gov/laws/2023/0/Session+Law/Chapter/67/

    Subd. 2. Membership; terms. (a) The commissioner, in consultation with the commissioners of health and the Pollution Control Agency, must appoint 11 residents of Minnesota to the advisory council, and the appointees must include:
    (1) two members who are members of the Minnesota Ojibwe Tribe;

    (2) two members who are members of the Minnesota Dakota Tribe; and

    (3) four members who identify as Black or African American, Hispanic or Latino, Asian, or Pacific Islander or as members of a community of color.

    This is the actual (vague) ballot language:

    “Shall the Minnesota Constitution be amended to protect drinking water sources and the water quality of lakes, rivers, and streams; conserve wildlife habitat and natural areas; improve air quality; and expand access to parks and trails by extending the transfer of proceeds from the state-operated lottery to the environment and natural resources trust fund, and to dedicate the proceeds for these purposes?”

    Once again, politics stands in the way of an otherwise good bill.

    I would vote NO, and compel the legislature to take the politics out of it.

  4. Read a bit closer, that new committee only gets 1.5%. Gotta read everything before seeing “BIPOC” and shutting down.

  5. Yes we need to get this passed. Also important is the e-tab issue. The changes coming to e-tabs for next year. could hurt our charitable organizations..

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Share on Social

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email

Hand-Picked For You

Related Articles

For a limited time, you can get full access to breaking news, all original Outdoor News stories and updates from the entire Great Lakes Region and beyond, the most up-to-date fishing & hunting reports, lake maps, photo & video galleries, the latest gear, wild game cooking tips and recipes, fishing & hunting tips from pros and experts, bonus web content and much, much more, all on your smartphone, tablet or desktop For just a buck per month!

Some restrictions apply. Not valid with other promotions. $1 per month for 6 months (you will be billed $6) and then your subscription will renew at standard subscription rates. For more information see Terms and Conditions. This offer only applies to OutdoorNews.com and not for any Outdoor News print subscriptions. Offer valid thru 3/31/23.

Already a subscriber to OutdoorNews.com? Click here to login.

Before you go... Get the latest outdoor news sent to your inbox.


Sign up for our free newsletter.

Email Address(Required)
Name
What outdoor activities interest you?