Wolf kills of livestock and pets are down in Wisconsin a bit from last year at this time, but the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) may still have to prorate damage payments to livestock and pet owners this fiscal year because of DNR budget concerns (see Kevin Naze’s story in this issue for full details).
The DNR’s current fiscal year began July 1. The DNR may hold off all wolf kill payments until the end of the fiscal year (June 30, 2027) in order to compare claims to cash on hand. In the meantime, DNR principals are applying for federal grants in hopes of covering any shortages. I’m not sure why we haven’t heard about this one yet, but there is a very easy solution to this problem.
Start a wolf hunting and trapping season. Simple Simon.
I know. I know. We can’t have a wolf season because Great Lakes wolves are still on the federal Endangered Species List yada, yada, yada. I’m tired of hearing that B.S. Wolves in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Michigan should have been delisted 15 years ago at a minimum.
Delist wolves, start a season, and use the application and license fees to cover the wolf kill damage claims. Those fees will more than cover loss payments. Problem solved.
MORE COVERAGE FROM WISCONSIN OUTDOOR NEWS:
Federal court kicks lawsuit on wake surfing against Wisconsin town of Scott
Wisconsin’s wolf damage coffers running low
Longtime forester Mike Amman appointed to fill Wisconsin Natural Resources Board vacancy
AS LONG AS I’M ALREADY TICKED OFF, let’s go a little farther down this wolf road on two more things. Language used by the DNR and wolf protectionists, and wolf caution areas.
Depredation. Depredate upon. Who the hell really uses that kind of language in day-to-day conversation? No one, unless you are someone trying to soften the blow of what wolves do to livestock and pets.
Depredation means kill. Wolves kill livestock and pets. Then they eat some of them. They don’t depredate upon them. They rip them apart and eat them.
Now, those wolf caution areas. I’m really tired of hearing wolf protectionists tell us that wolves won’t kill our dogs if we just avoided the DNR’s wolf caution areas. Well, when two-thirds of the state is inhabited by wolves, then two-thirds of the state is one big wolf caution area.
There is almost nowhere in this state that I could run a dog without having to worry about the dog getting clobbered and “depredated upon” by a wolf. The DNR has basically created a no-hunting zone for dog owners.
Look, I do not hate wolves. I am just sick and more than tired of all the mismanagement that I’ve witnessed since the night in 1987 at James Williams Junior High School in Rhinelander when I heard the DNR’s Dick Thiel (now retired) tell us we would never have more than 80 to 100 wolves under the wolf recovery plan. Forty years I’ve watched this misbegotten program unravel. Now I want to depredate something.
WISCONSIN’S PRIMARY ELECTION arrives Tuesday, Aug. 11. Go to myvote.wi.gov to see a complete list of all candidates for your area. Yeah, I’ve been thoroughly disenchanted with some of our leadership over all the years I’ve been voting, but I will again drag my happy rear end to the polls. Mostly because if I don’t I can’t complain.
THIS WEEK IN ROCK AND ROLL history, guitarist Jeff “Skunk” Baxter left Steely Dan to join The Doobie Brothers in 1974, while in 1987, members of Def Leppard released their blockbuster album “Hysteria.” So go ahead, pour some sugar on something this week. Yeah, baby.



3 thoughts on “State Roundup: A simple solution to paying for Wisconsin’s wolf damage claims”
Just wondering if the DNR claims wolf numbers are down. That must mean they think they have a count, how else could they claim they know the number is down. Tell us how many there are in Wisconsin.
Douglas County has been in the news regularly with “wolf depredations” and clearly has too large of a wolf population. The wolf caution areas and reservation “safe zone” means the area to recreate your household canine is shrinking rapidly. Wolf packs will expand throughout the state for food and the “minimum count” fantasy would get you arrested if you were an accountant for malpractice. Protectionists will intentionally undercount to preserve the lie that wolves still need ESA protections. Wolves belong, but the State of Wisconsin’s wolf management plan with no numeric goals is a contrivance to continue the status quo. Sportsmen are no longer being heard or represented. It’s time to take back the DNR by getting a new governor who supports hunters and fishermen.
Right on, Dean. And please, write on, too. I’m with you. Not opposed to wolves on the landscape in the wildest areas, at the counts we were told would be a recovered population decades ago.
I’ve seen photos of Wisconsin dogs, horses, calves and more absolutely ripped apart by wolves, some of them nothing but skin left and others (horses) still alive, traumatized in the worst way. I see repeated misinformation from wolf huggers weekly, always with the never-ending “we need your help to win this fight” ask for money. There are people making a living off of fake news on wolves.
It’s long past time for the feds to turn over management authority to the states, and for states to start listening to the sportsmen and women that pay their salaries and get wolf populations under control. No one in wolf country believes the minimum population estimates are anywhere close to reality.