Wisconsin deer hunters who have been begging and pleading for the DNR and Natural Resources Board (NRB) to dump the Dr. James Kroll county deer unit system and go back to habitat-based numbered units like we use to have can now be thankful.
On Feb. 26, NRB members voted unanimously to adopt a plan the puts the state’s two forest zones, northern and central, back into numbered units.
There are some huge thank-you’s to be offered here, but there first thank you has to go to a man who is no longer with us. That would be Al Horvath, of Douglas County.
NRB Chair Bill Smith was spot-on that day when he took a minute to thank Horvath for his work on getting this change started almost (a little exaggerated – it might have been two years) the day the county system was adopted. Smith and Horvath were well acquainted, but even if they weren’t Horvath would have made sure Smith understands that a county deer unit system simply can not work in Douglas County.
Or Bayfield County.
Or Ashland County.
Or Marinette County.
Or Oconto County.
Or Oneida County … you get the picture.
Why we had to suffer through 12, 13 years of this aggravation I will never understand (well, I do know why, but that doesn’t mean the county system was the right way to go on this issue), but at least now we can begin working on streamlining our deer management system in the two forest zones. I wouldn’t be surprised if at some point more of the state doesn’t join the numbered unit system.

So, yes, thanks so much to Al Horvath in getting this ball rolling. I’d also like to thank all of the CDAC members and deer hunters who took the time to attend meetings and contact NRB members and legislators on this front.
We also have to thank legislators who not only held hearings in Madison, but also across the northern counties to gather input on this desired change. In particular, I’ll applaud Chanz Green, a state Assembly representative from northwestern Wisconsin who attended CDAC meetings in his district, as well as the Feb. 26 NRB meeting, to support the concept.
Not too far behind Green are Sen. Romaine Quinn and Sen. Rob Stafsholt.
Deer hunters should also take a minute to thank Smith and NRB member Marcy West. Yes, board members voted unanimously last Wednesday to approve the emergency rule process that will allow this new deer unit plan to move forward; Smith and West have been tracking this movement since its inception.
There’s no way I can know this, but I’d bet the royalties from Jeff Nania’s fifth book (I was told last week it’s almost to the printer) that Smith and West helped the new NRB members not only understand why this change was being sought, but also why we’d be better off going the emergency rule route than going through a permanent rule process.
So, Bill and Marcy, on behalf of any deer hunters who would allow me to speak for them, thank you for your veteran guidance.
Now we go to the guy who did the heavy lifting – Jeff Pritzl, the DNR’s deer program director. I can’t even imagine the hoops, hurdles, moats and mountains Pritzl had to navigate to not only get this concept before the NRB last week, but to have it also arrive in a condition where no one (well, virtually no one – remember, there is no chortling in this space) could create any doubt this plan should be enacted.

I’ve talked about Pritzl in this space before. I don’t “know know” the guy, but I do know Pritzl to the extent where I would happily buy him his favorite brew of sarsaparilla if I ran into him at a place such as, oh, say Patsy’s in Washburn or The Big Dipper in Pike Lake (by the way, I had a fish fry at The Big Dipper last Friday with reader Terry Teeters – highly recommend the food).
And, I wouldn’t even let Pritzl first ask the DNR’s Department of Communications for permission to talk to me first. I’d just slam the frosty mug in his hand.
Getting this plan to the NRB and to get it passed with the support shown by NRB members and deer hunters could not have been easy. So, Mr. Pritzl, even though we have printed letters from readers who suggested you should retire, go ahead and stick around for a while yet – and thanks so much not only for your hard work, but your dedication to your job.
Emergency rule
One key piece to this whole deal is the fact that the NRB approved the change through the DNR’s emergency rule process.
That works in our favor in several ways – it’s in place now, meaning we will work under the new numbered unit system for all 2025-26 deer seasons starting when the archery deer season opens in September. If the NRB had gone with the permanent rule process, it might have taken three years to adopt the changes.
Couple more things about the emergency rule route:
• There is one more opportunity for public input (I think it’s within 60 or 90 days of the NRB approval) and that wouldn’t be the case if the NRB had gone permanent rule;
• We are having a mild winter so deer survival and fawn recruitment should be as good as we could hope as long as nothing changes weather-wise between now and the end of May, so it’s a great time to make this change from that standpoint;
• We have the opportunity to review unit boundaries in another three years if anything needs to be tweaked – having the plan in place now gives us the opportunity to “see how it fits;”
• This change will be in place and have a little “age” on it when it goes to the CDAC spring meetings. CDAC members will have time between now and then to get familiar with the plan and begin thinking about how these changes will play out in their areas.
There’s a whole lot more to learn about this new deer unit plan and we’ll take the time going forward to slowly pull it apart and look at the guts of it between now and September, but maybe start out by studying the map and see how it applies to your hunting area.
Just what CDACs might look like in the future, as far as fitting into the units, will be determined as we move ahead. Public and private land antlerless tags will remain in place. The Deer Management Assistance Program will remain whole.
I think this plan has a ton of potential. I can’t wait to see it get to work.



4 thoughts on “Dean Bortz: Habitat-based deer units back in place in Wisconsin’s forest zones”
It’s a great idea and it never should have been changed but in northern Wisconsin it won’t do a thing til they delist wolves, make a management plan, hunt wolves and lower their numbers to 350 which the DNR own studies placed that number at before human conflict arises and our deer herd is wiped out to numbers so low there won’t even be a huntable population. Also Jeff Pritzl has to go and put someone in charge that’s not a DNR yes man and caves to special groups instead of managing deer fir the people who fund 80 percent of the DNR budget -Hunters
I had read in an article from another source that Evers could veto the emergency rule. Is this not true? Or Did he sign it already so that it can move forward?
I have hunted Bayfield county for 30 years and have watched the decline up close in deer numbers on public land in the big forest north of US 2. To many anterless permits given out and shoot em up mentality of brown it’s down. The arrival of the wolf really had a impact and as there numbers increased, less and less deer. Multiple packs of 17, 8, 7 and less. Deer changed the way they moved and no longer followed normal trail patterns but became wandering deer not wanting to get ambushed by packs in waiting! Add more bear, and yes, cougars to the mix has really made it difficult to bring numbers back. Even coyotes are getting less and less as they become prey to the wolf. Get the wolf managed and get rid of the anterless permits in northern forests. Last year really was the worst I have experienced with boots on the ground.
Craig… I have been hunting in central Bayfield county (between 63 and 2) for 25yrs and my family for well over 70+ years. It is rare for us not to see any deer for gun season. What hurts us is the “buck only”. We tend to see 3-5 doe every year consistently. Out of the past 10 years, we have been successful I believe 6 of those years, with decent bucks (6-10pts). I do not know where this “decline” is that you speak of, but maybe your hunting spot needs to change. Do I think other predators are successfully killing deer….yes, do I feel that they are “wiping out the heard”…No. Do a quick google search… average WI wolf kills 2-3 deer a week, or 20k a year in WI per the wolf population. sounds like a lot… oddly enough there are roughly 20k deer/vehicle collision deaths every year… and average of 300k/year from hunting…so if your claim that predators are killing too many, we should restrict the number of tags sold so that less deer get shot for sport…lets say then 200k/year max…that would be more beneficial to the heard by leaving 100k more deer every year to repopulate. Make it a lottery for deer permits like the wolf/bear/ tags. I personally would rather they remove the “farmer permits” because to my understanding there is no real limit to the amount you get… and yet I hear all the time about farmers just “selling” their permits to IL or MN hunters…and leave corn rows for bait to keep the deer coming back. ~800 wolves is a manageable number… 1.5 – 2 million deer… ridiculous to manage.