NY: Debate over fracking’s effects on fish, wildlife

Elmira, N.Y. – As the debate over the safety of hydraulic
fracturing for natural gas rages in New York, sportsmen’s groups
are watching with more than idle curiosity.

New Yorkers concerned about the impact of the controversial gas
extraction method don’t have to look any farther than their
neighbors to the south for some answers.

Hydrofracking is already approved in Pennsylvania, and exploration
and drilling are booming in Northern Tier counties.

So far, there has not been a significant negative impact on game
fish, said Rob Wnuk, area fisheries manager with the Pennsylvania
Fish and Boat Commission.

“We’ve had one major incident with fracking fluid spilling into a
stream (in Bradford County) that caused us to terminate a fish
stocking,” Wnuk said. “We haven’t had any fish kills or anything
like that yet. (But) all it takes is one incident that could cause
long-term problems. We’ve been lucky so far. There are a lot of
rules in place.”

In fact, hydrofracking can have several beneficial effects on
wildlife, according to Jerry Feaser, a spokesman for the
Pennsylvania Game Commission.

Well and pipeline development often creates new openings in
forested areas that can attract deer, turkeys and other wildlife,
Feaser said.

There are financial incentives that can benefit game and other
species as well, he added.

“We haven’t had a license fee increase since 1999 in Pennsylvania,
so our license dollar revenue has been flat. But with this increase
in mineral rights, oil and gas, we’re able to do things we
previously had to put aside,” said Feaser, who said a primary use
of the revenue is to purchase additional state game lands to offset
the possible loss of other land to drilling.

At the same time, Northern Tier sportsmen aren’t taking it for
granted that the natural gas drilling boom is all good for

They are, in fact, watching the developments with a healthy dose of

“What we’re doing is starting a water monitoring program. We’re
trying to get a baseline on acidity and total dissolved solids, pH,
that kind of thing, so when something goes wrong down the road, gas
companies can’t say ‘It’s always been like that,'” said William
Paulmier of Westfield, Tioga County, Pa., president of the
Tiadaghton Chapter of Trout Unlimited.

“We’re trying to learn by the mistakes we learned 100 years ago
from the coal industry,” Paulmier said. “Trout Unlimited’s official
stance is we’re not against drilling – just be responsible.”

New York is looking hard at how Pennsylvania and other states are
handling hydrofracking – both what they are doing right and
mistakes they might have made along the way, said DEC spokeswoman
Emily DeSantis.

If and when hydrofracking is approved in New York, the impact on
wildlife should be minimal, DeSantis said.

“Under the draft SGEIS (supplemental generic environmental impact
statement), surface drilling is not allowed in certain state lands
where hunting is a principal use,” she said. “In addition, the
draft SGEIS examines the potential impacts on wildlife in grassland
and forest habitats and includes measures to mitigate those
impacts. Discharges to streams are addressed in many ways
(engineering controls, setbacks, etc.) and, therefore, impacts on
fish are not anticipated.”

Those assurances are little comfort to people who have been
fighting to keep hydrofracking out of New York state, including
Peter Gamba of Branchport, in Yates County.

Gamba, who lives near Keuka Lake, is chairman of the Committee to
Preserve the Finger Lakes, and he believes hydrofracking will
adversely affect humans and animals.

“We do have a lot of hunting up here. If this stuff comes in, it’s
going to go away. It does affect the wildlife,” Gamba said. “They
are coming into an area that is rural in nature, agricultural, and
it will upset that whole environment and make it toxic.”

Not so fast, said Chris Yearick, a biologist by profession, avid
outdoorsman and president of the Chemung County Federation of

Yearick isn’t ready to condemn the practice. In fact, hydrofracking
has the potential to do both harm and good for wildlife, he

“We’re concerned. You are talking huge amounts of water withdrawal.
That can be a big issue, especially in a low flow year like this
summer,” Yearick said. “It can go both ways. It can have great
benefits. One thing we are seeing is, with pipelines, you have food
plots. We have 300 acres on our property. We had a pipeline go
across. We seeded it. (The gas company) reimbursed us. Now we have
bear, deer and turkeys. They just love it.”

Categories: News Archive

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *