USFWS revamps plan for Mississippi River refuge

By Frederic J. Frommer

Associated Press

Washington (AP) – Federal officials are creating a new plan for
protecting the Upper Mississippi River National Wildlife Refuge
after the original proposal prompted a backlash over restrictions
on hunting, camping and other uses.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, which held 17 hearings and
eight workshops up and down the river since announcing the original
conservation plan in May, will now issue an “alternative” plan in
October. The plan would then be finalized after 45 days of public
comments.

Federal officials say it’s too soon to say how the new plan will
differ from the original one, but they say it will take into
account public comments which included objections to restrictions
on hunting, boating and public access.

Rep. Ron Kind, a Wisconsin Democrat who objected to some of
those restrictions, said officials will back off on them in the new
plan.

“They realize they have to do that or there will be a public
outcry,” said Kind, a duck hunter with a house on the Mississippi.
“It would make enforceability very difficult if not impossible, and
they certainly don’t have the money to go out and hire 500 new
agents in the refuge system.”

The Fish and Wildlife Service’s goal is to reduce human stress
on the fragile river environment and improve wild habitats.
Controversial elements in the original plan included limiting
overnight camping to main channel islands and shorelines;
restricting speeds on backwater areas to 5 mph; increasing
no-hunting zones; and banning anyone with a blood-alcohol level of
0.08 percent or higher from camping.

The conservation plan would lay out regulations through the year
2020 for about 240,000 acres of Mississippi floodplain designated
as a national wildlife refuge.

The refuge stretches about 260 miles from southern Minnesota to
northern Illinois. It’s home to hundreds of species of plants, fish
and birds, including bald eagles.

The federal Wildlife Refuge Improvement Act of 1997 requires
refuges be managed according to their mission to restore fish,
wildlife and plants. The act calls for every national refuge to
have a plan by 2012.

Scott Flaherty, a Fish and Wildlife spokesman based at Ft.
Snelling, said more than 2,600 people attended the public hearings.
Some were against any change, while others supported the proposed
changes in the original plan, he said.

Most discussion focused on hunting, fishing, beach use, closed
areas and motorless areas, he said.

“The new plan will probably be a hybrid of options presented in
the original plan plus recommendations from workshops,” Flaherty
said. “It will reflect the input of a lot of people up and down the
river.”

Brad Redlin, Mississippi River coordinator for the Izaak Walton
League of America, a conservation group, said the league supported
the original plan.

“Seeking public comment on conservation plans for public lands
is clearly the right thing to do, and responsiveness to those
comments is appropriate and expected,” said Redlin, who is based in
St. Paul. “But the resource base itself has no voice to comment.
Habitat protection and scientific principles must be given priority
over present-day public preferences.”

He added: “The mission of wildlife conservation is to perpetuate
natural habitats that will support abundant wildlife populations,
not to preside over the allocation of a vanishing resource.”

Categories: Hunting News

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *